arch/ive/ief (2000 - 2005)

Ses jours ne sont pas en danger et il a pu sortir vendredi soir de l'hôpital Saint-Antoine où il avait été admis.

Gabriel Fahri, qui milite "pour une solution pacifique entre Israël et les Palestiniens", avait reçu le matin même de l'agression "des menaces écrites avec référence au jihad et à la guerre contre tous les ennemis des Palestiniens".

-------------------------

»L'agression de Gabriel Fahri



L'agression a eu lieu dans la synagogue du 23 rue Pétion (XIe arrondissement).

La police a indiqué que le rabbin avait été blessé à l'abdomen et transporté en urgence à l'hôpital Saint-Antoine.

Le rabbin Gabriel Farhi, âgé de 34 ans, qui officie dans cette synagogue depuis sept ans, a indiqué que la blessure était "étalée mais peu profonde".

Il a raconté qu'il avait été agressé vers 16H30 par un homme casqué alors qu'il se trouvait seul dans la synagogue, peu avant le début de l'office du shabbat prévu à 18H30.

"Je me trouvais seul dans la synagogue. Quelqu'un a sonné à la porte. J'ai ouvert, un homme un peu plus petit que moi - environ 1m75 - , la tête couverte d'un casque de moto intégral avec la visière opaque rabaissée a prononcé 'Allahou Akbar' et m'a donné un coup de couteau'. Son accent était très français", a déclaré le rabbin .

"Il n'y a eu aucun témoin. Les forces de police et le SAMU sont intervenus très rapidement", a ajouté Gabriel Fahri qui a l'habitude d'avoir des rendez-vous dans cette synagogue le vendredi soir avant l'office.

La 2e DPJ est chargée de l'enquête.
-------------------------



»Un militant de la paix



Le rabbin a rappelé qu'il militait "pour une solution pacifique entre Israël et les Palestiniens" et appartenait au Mouvement juif libéral de France (MJLF).

Dans un communiqué, le MJLF indique que la lettre de menaces "disait entre autres 'nous aurons la peau du rabbin Gabriel Farhi et vengerons le sang de nos frères palestiniens. Nous lancerons contre lui le jihad , châtiment réservé aux ennemis de notre cause. Après avoir mis feu à sa synagogue, nous nous vengerons directement sur lui'".

Le MJLF rappelle qu'au mois de mai, une incendie a "très sérieusement endommagé" la synagogue du MJLF de la rue Pétion et que d'autres menaces y sont parvenues depuis.

L'administrateur du MJLF, Franck Stepler, a également rappelé que ce mouvement était "très actif dans le dialogue inter-religieux".

Le MJLF est un mouvement minoritaire en France qui prône des rites libéraux et un judaïsme moderniste, accueillant notamment les convertis et les couples mixtes. Le mouvement est animé par le père de Gabriel Farhi, Daniel Farhi, qui officie dans l'autre synagogue de ce mouvement, dans le 15e arrondissement.
-------------------------



»Réactions



*Le maire (PS) de Paris, Bertrand Delanoë, a fait part dans un communiqué transmis vendredi soir à l'AFP de "son émotion, de son indignation devant l'odieuse agression dont a été victime le rabbin Farhi dans sa synagogue".

* La revue des cultures musulmanes, la Médina, a fait état samedi de sa "stupéfaction", après l'agression contre le rabbin Gabriel Farhi blessé vendredi d'un coup de couteau à l'intérieur d'une synagogue à Paris, affirmant ne pas "pouvoir accepter de tels actes qui se réclament de l'islam".

Fondée en 1998 par Hakim el Ghissassi, jeune Français d'origine marocaine,
la Médina se veut "espace d'information, de réflexion et de dialogue constructif
sur les cultures musulmanes en France et en Europe".

*François Hollande a exprimé, au nom du Parti socialiste, son indignation après l'agression contre le rabbin Gabriel Farhi.

*Le consistoire israélite de Paris a qualifié de "geste ignoble" l'agression contre le rabbin Gabriel Farhi.

* Le recteur de la Mosquée de Paris, Dalil Boubakeur, a exprimé son "indignation" et dénoncé "un acte aussi ignoble que rien ne peut justifier".

Gabriel Farhi, un rabbin d'une synagogue du 11e arrondissement à Paris, a été victime d'une agression à l'arme blanche à l'intérieur de l'édifice vendredi vers 17h. Blessé à l'abdomen, il a été transporté à l'hôpital Saint-Antoine d'où il est sorti quelques heures plus tard.

Le jeune rabbin de 34 ans a raconté qu'il avait été agressé par un homme casqué alors qu'il se trouvait seul dans la synagogue un peu avant le début de l'office du shabbat. L'agresseur aurait lancé un "Allahou Akbar" avant de planter son couteau dans le ventre de sa victime. "Son accent était très français", a précisé le rabbin qui a rappelé qu'il militait "pour une solution pacifique entre Israël et les Palestiniens".

"Nous aurons sa peau"

La synagogue dépend du Mouvement juif libéral de France (MJLF), mouvement minoritaire créé en juin 1977, et qui dispose d'une autre synagogue dans le XVe arrondissement. Dans un communiqué, le mouvement indique que Gabriel Farhi a reçu une lettre de menaces le matin même.

Elle disait entre autres, selon le communiqué, "nous aurons la peau du rabbin Gabriel Farhi et vengerons le sang de nos frères palestiniens. (...) Nous lancerons contre lui le jihad, châtiment réservé aux ennemis de notre cause (...) Après avoir mis feu à sa synagogue, nous nous vengerons directement sur lui".

Speaking in Jerusalem Dec. 20, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzer made the connection between the growth of the Islamic fundamentalist groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and Israel's promotion of the Islamic movement as a counter to the Palestinian nationalist movement. Kurtzer's comments come very close to EIR's own presentation of the evidence of Israel's instrumental role in establishing Hamas, and its ongoing control of that organization.

Kurtzer said that the growth of the Islamic movement in the Palestinian territories in recent decades—"with the tacit support of Israel"—was "not totally unrelated" to the emergence of Hamas and Islamic Jihad and their terrorist attacks against Israel. Kurtzer explained that during the 1980s, when the Islamic movement began to flourish in the West Bank and Gaza, "Israel perceived it to be better to have people turning toward religion rather than toward a nationalistic cause [the Palestinian Liberation Organization—ed.]." It therefore did little to stop the flow of money to mosques and other religious institutions, rather than to schools.

According to the Dec. 21 Israeli daily Ha'aretz, Kurtzer made these extraordinary statements at a seminar on religion and politics sponsored by Oz V'Shalom-Netivot Shalom, a largely Anglo-American organization that promotes peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Rabbi Dr. Aharon Lichtenstein, the head of Har Etzion Yeshiva in Alon Shvut, who is an active advocate of a just regional peace, also spoke. Kurtzer said that as a result of the growth of Islam at the expense of education, there are now Palestinians who are "determined terrorists that use religious beliefs in a perverted way to appeal to the masses."

Kurtzer said that cultural and religious interaction is potentially a way to "build bridges." But instead, "the perverted use of religion in the region is today becoming one of the great challenges for the years ahead." He said that there is no "inherent component" in Islam that advocates violence. But one of the five principles of Islam, jihad—resistance—"in classic religious associations connotes religious belief and fervor, not violence." But extremists have distorted the meaning of jihad, so it now has a connotation of violence in the service of a religious purpose.

The Enemy of My Enemy Is My Friend This statement is extraordinary given the fact that Kurtzer is a very senior diplomat, having held the post of Ambassador to Egypt just prior to going on to Tel Aviv. He is also an Orthodox Jew who is not shy of criticizing the extreme anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic views held by certain Arab circles. But Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon rarely grants the United States' highest representative in Israel an official audience.

The ambassador's comments are an acknowledgment of what any serious Middle East observers knows: Hamas has always been seen as a tool by which Israel could undermine the nationalist movement led by Palestinian Authority President and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Chairman Yasser Arafat. Similar statements by Arafat have been dismissed by Israel as "cranky" propaganda. In an interview with the Dec. 11 Italian daily Corriere della Sera, Arafat said,

"We are doing everything to stop the violence. But Hamas is a creature of Israel which at the time of Prime Minister [Yitzhak] Shamir [the late 1980s, when Hamas arose], gave them money and more than 700 institutions, among them schools, universities and mosques. Even [former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak] Rabin ended up admitting it, when I charged him with it, in the presence of [Egpytian President Hosni] Mubarak."

To the Italian daily L'Espresso, Arafat laid out the reasons for this support. "Hamas was constituted with the support of Israel. The aim was to create an organization antagonistic to the PLO. They received financing and training from Israel. They have continued to benefit from permits and authorizations, while we have been limited, even to build a tomato factory. Rabin himself defined it as a fatal error. Some collaborationists of Israel are involved in these [terror] attacks," he said. "We have proof, and we are placing it at the disposal of the Italian government."

On one level the support for Hamas is simply the application of the old saying, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." Indeed, in the minds of crude Israeli ultra-nationalists and fascists such as Sharon and his faction, this is indeed the case. Sharon is not interested in peace and therefore is not concerned that the violence and needless deaths of Israelis and Palestinians continue. In the Jan. 3 Ha'aretz, Yossi Sarid, chairman of the Meretz party, wrote, "What does frighten Sharon ... is any prospect or sign of calm or moderation. If the situation were to calm down and stabilize, Sharon would have to return to the negotiating table and, in the wake of pressure from within and without, he would have to raise serious proposals for an agreement. This moment terrifies Sharon and he wants to put it off for as long as he possibly can." In contrast, Sarid said that Sharon understands "that the terrorists and those who give them asylum are not the real enemies. Instead, the real enemies are the moderates.... You fight terrorists—a pretty simple operation—but you must talk with moderates, and this is a very tricky, if not dangerous, business."

More important for the survival of not only the Palestinian people, but especially Israel itself, is the dangerous role of the puppetmasters outside the region, who are manipulating both sides of this deadly game as part of their own demonic plans to spread the policy of a "clash of civilizations." In this regard, Sharon, and his "Greater Israel" policy, is just as much a puppet as the Palestinian, strapped with explosives, who blows himself up at an Israeli bus station.

Two Decades of Undermining Arafat Given the level of control that the Israeli intelligence services such as the Shin Bet and Mossad have been able to exert over the Palestinian territories during the last 35 years of Israeli occupation, the capability to manipulate militant and violent organizations, such as those associated with Hamas, should not surprise anyone familiar with intelligence and even routine police operations. This should be obvious, considering that Israel has routinely recruited thousands of collaborators and provocateurs among the tens of thousands of Palestinians who have passed through Israeli prisons in over 35 years of its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Most convincing is a comparison of the development of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and their antecedents, and the growing national and international legitimacy of the PLO and its undisputed leader, Arafat.

Hamas is an acronym for Harafat al-Muqawama Al-Islamiyya, or Islamic Resistance Movement. Its spiritual leader is Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, who, despite his fiery anti-Israeli sermons, has had an unusual relationship with the Israeli authorities. In 1973, Yassin established the Islamic Association—at a time when it was Israeli policy to promote what Ambassador Kurtzer refers to as the "Islamic movement."

One might ask: Why should Israel promote an Islamic movement which later turns around and attacks it? How could the Israeli secret services be taken in by a Yassin? They weren't. The simple fact is, that the stated policy of Hamas is simply the flip side of Sharon's "Greater Israel" policy that refuses to seek a territorial compromise. The Hamas charter in 1988 stated, "The land of Palestine has been an Islamic Waqf throughout the generations, and until the Day of Resurrection, no one can renounce it or part of it, or abandon it or part of it.... Peace initiatives, the so-called peace initiatives, are all contraray to the beliefs of Hamas, for renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing part of the religion." In this rhetoric there is no room for a state of Israel—as there is none for a state of Palestine in Sharon's "Greater Israel."

Israel's Hamas relations intensified after the Arab League, in 1974, decided to recognize Arafat and the PLO as the representatives of the Palestinian people—in effect, a government in exile. By 1979, top Yassin acquired an official permit from the Israeli government of Prime Minister Menachem Begin. This coincided with the signing of the Camp David peace treaty between Israel and Egypt. That treaty embodied detailed clauses calling for the establishment of a Palestinian Authority in the Occupied Territories, which would be the precursor for the Israeli withdrawal and the establishment of a Palestinian state. Gen. Ariel Sharon has been the chief proponent since this treaty was signed, of the policy of ensuring that these clauses would never be implemented. His chosen alternatives were war in Lebanon and the expansion of the Jewish settlements in the Occupied Territories. Sharon was helped by the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat by Anglo-American-controlled, Egypt-based Islamic terrorists.

`Policy of Strengthening Islamic Bodies' Israeli toleration, if not initial sponsorship of the Islamic movement, has been acknowledged and well documented in Israeli sources. In 1997, the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, at Tel Aviv University, published a study, "Hamas: Radical Islam In A National Struggle," authored by Anat Kurz and Nahman Tal. It stated that the Islamic Association, "the platform of which contained no nationalist clauses, obtained a permit from the Israeli Civil Administration in 1979 to conduct its activities. The permit was apparently consistent with the Israeli policy of strengthening Islamic bodies as a counterweight to Palestinian nationalist groups."

The rapid expansion of the Islamic Association led to clashes on the Palestinian University campuses in the Occupied Territories in the 1980s, betwen PLO-affiliated students and those associated with the Islamists. This expansion was aided by the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, where Sharon hoped to solve the "Palestinian problem" by militarily crushing the PLO—which was then based in Lebanon—and by carrying out genocide against the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians living in impoverished refugee camps in Lebanon. Despite his orchestration of the massacre of thousands of Palestinians, including women and children, at the Sabra and Chatila refugee camps, Sharon failed to eliminate Arafat. Nonetheless, Arafat and the PLO were exiled to Tunisia, their influence severely weakened.

Sheikh Yassin, along with other Hamas leaders, was arrested in 1984, after it was discovered that the Islamic Association had maintained arms caches. But the organization was not banned. In fact, Yassin was soon released as part of an unprecedented prisoner exchange between Israel and Ahmed Jabril's PFLP-General Command. This deal, made with one of the most violent of all anti-PLO Palestinian groups at the time, was made in a period when the Mossad was busy assassinating the most moderate of PLO leaders.

Then, in 1988, the Islamic Association created Hamas as a direct alternative to the PLO, which had launched the first Intifada the year before. 1988 was also important because the PLO, at the 19th Conference of the Palestinian National Council in Algeria in 1988, accepted the United Nations Security Council resolution of 1947 calling for two states in Palestine. They also called for convening an international peace conference based on UN Resolutions 242 and 338, which established the land-for-peace concept. This was a de facto recognition of Israel by the PLO and Arafat. By the end of 1988, the Reagan Administration extended official recognition to the PLO as the official representative of the Palestinian people.

When Palestinian leader Abu Jihad began negotiating with Hamas, in an attempt to win its mass base over to the new policy, he was promptly assassinated by the Mossad.

Yassin, as all senior leaders of Hamas, is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, the far-flung international Islamic organization with operations throughout the Islamic world. In the past, Anglo-American factions have not hesitated to manipulate the Brotherhood's various factions to destabilize secular Arab regimes. When Zbigniew Brzezinski launched the Afghan war against Russia in the 1980s, many of the Arab mujahideen fighters were recruited through Muslim Brotherhood-linked networks. The Muslim Brotherhood story fills volumes; the crucial point here is that Hamas, one of its branches, has traditionally stood in opposition to the secular nationalism of Arafat, the PLO, and its supporting governments.

Hamas has a peculiar organizational structure which contrasts sharply with that of the PLO. While within the West Bank and Gaza, Hamas exists as a broad political movement, its militant wings, the Izza-Din Al Qassam and Islamic Jihad, split-offs from the organization, are administered totally separately. These latter organizations, which are responsible for the attacks, are under the control of leaders who operate from abroad. Their offices are in London, where the group's magazine, Falatin Al Muslimah, is based; Jordan; Syria; and the United States, particularly in Virginia and Texas. Although Arafat has periodically tried to bring the popular base of Hamas into the Palestinian fold, the foreign-based military leadership has always opposed him.

This bifurcation dovetails with Sharon's strategy of launching brutal attacks against Hamas targets, in order to elicit the equally brutal response from Islamic Jihad and the Izza-Din Al Qassam. Thus Arafat, and diplomatic goals, are undermined, and the fires of civil war within the Occupied Territories are stoked.

The Anti-Oslo Terror Campaign Begins The Oslo Accords marked the first glimmer of hope for a resolution of the Middle East conflict. And, the first suicide terrorist attack aimed at destroying it was not launched by Hamas or Islamic Jihad or another Palestinian faction. The first suicide attack was launched on Feb. 25, 1994, by Israeli terrorist Baruch Goldstein, when he entered the Mosque of Hebron and killed 50 Muslim worshippers as well as himself. Goldstein was a member of Kach, the terrorist organization founded by the late Meir Kahane, who also founded the Jewish Defense League in the 1960s in the United States. Kach, which is well connected to Sharon, is on the official U.S. State Department list of terrorist organizations.

The unprecedented massacre was calculated to set the stage for a suicide bombing campaign by Hamas and its split-off, Islamic Jihad, over the next year. In fact, it set into motion the "cycle of violence" that has yet to end. The Goldstein attack came at precisely the point when Israeli Prime Minister Rabin and Arafat began the formal implementation of the Oslo agreement which envisioned the establishment of a Palestinian state by 1998. The first Hamas-linked suicide attacks did not start until two months later, in April 1994, when Rabin and Arafat signed the agreement for the establishment of the Palestinian National Authority. The agreement called for the conduct of free elections throughout the territories—which would eventually establish the international legitimacy of the Arafat-led government.

But despite this terror campaign, which lasted for months under a massive crackdown by Arafat's security forces, the Rabin-Arafat alliance, although seriously weakened, was not broken. This alliance was finally broken with Rabin's assassination by an Israeli, on Nov. 5, 1995.

The next phase of attacks followed the "targetted assassination" of Hamas bomb-maker Yahya Ayyash on Jan. 5, 1996. Although said to be "revenge attacks," they were in fact part of Hamas' campaign to get Benjamin Netanyahu elected Israeli prime minister. This was admitted by Ibraham Ghawshah, Hamas' official spokesman resident in Amman, Jordan. He said that it was part of their strategy to influence Israeli public opinon to bring down the entire Oslo process. The election of Netanyahu indeed fulfilled all their hopes, especially after he launched his own provocations, which not only brought about the pre-calculated Hamas response, but also brought the region several times to the brink of war.

This tit-for-tat campaign reached the height of insanity when Netanyahu, under the direction of Sharon, who was a member of his government at the time, launched a Mossad assassination attempt in 1997 against the Jordan-based Hamas official Khalid Mishaal. Not only did the attempt fail, but it led to Israel agreeing to release Hamas spiritual leader Sheikh Yassin from an Israeli jail, where he had been under arrest since 1989. Yassin was allowed to return to Gaza to rally Hamas against the Oslo process in general, and Arafat in particular.

This pattern has continued to this very day. Netanyahu's downfall in 1999 led to the short-lived government of Ehud Barak, who despite much talking and negotiating, furthered the Oslo process not one iota. By the end of the Summer of 2000, the stage was set for Sharon's ultimate provocation, his Sept. 28 march on to the Islamic holy site Al-Haram Al-Sharif/Temple Mount.

Since coming to power, Sharon has done everything to ensure the collapse of Arafat and the Palestinian Authority. If successful, it would either bring Hamas to power or lead to political chaos within the terrorities.

Source :
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/AND204A.html

Elsa tu crois vraiment ce que dise l'ambassadeur des ETATS UNIS?????
En revenant au rabin, je doute fortement que ça soit le hamas qui l'a poignardé.
A ce qui dise le contraire (qui nie qu'il y ait de l'antisémitisme en France) je dis: et en 1940, c'était le hamas?? Ouvrez les yeux!!!!! (ou arreté d'etre hyppocryte)!

Copyright © Executive Intelligence Review 2002. Reprinted for fair use only

lien article: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/AND204A.html

Salut Cun,

Je ne nie évidemment pas que l'antisémitisme existe et qu'il faut le combattre, je tiens seulement à rappeler que les manipulations ça existe : il y a eu des attentats qui ont été commis dans le but de tourner l'opinion publique contre certaines populations. Je ne dis pas que c'est le cas ici, je veux seulement rappeler que ce pourrait être le cas. J'aurais sans doute du le préciser en introduction de l'article de Global Research.

Concernant ta remarque "j'vois qu'on croit les states juste quand ça arrange", tu fais de l'amalgame. D'une part les médias activistes constatent tous les jours que des ministres, diplomates, etc parlent parfois trop ("trop", au sens des intérêts qu'ils sont censés défendre, bien évidemment). Ce type de "gaffe" constitue une information de valeur. D'autre part tu trouveras très peu de média-activistes pour prétendre que tout ce qui est made in USA est bullshit, il suffit de regarder dans la colonne de gauche de cette page pour s'en rendre compte.

Bien à toi.

PS pour Guido : que signifie "Reprinted for fair use only" ?

Désolé,

je pensais que ca voudrait dire qu' on pouvait l'imprimer et lire à la maison.(quelque chose comme çà)

Excuses.

(J'apprends chaque jour)

Le chef du département politique de l'OLP, Farouk Kaddoumi, dit, "aucune différence entre l'OLP et le Hamas...Je sais ce que je dis, parce que j'ai 50 ans d'expérience et je sais comment analyser des choses"
Khaled Abu

Les Palestiniens ne demanderont pas au Hamas d'arrêter les attentats-suicide contre Israël avant que les Palestiniens n'aient obtenus des bénéfices politiques, a dit le chef du département politique de l'OLP, Farouk Kaddoumi, pendant le week-end.

"Nous nous battons comme un mouvement populaire et nous ne pouvons pas imposer de la discipline à tous ceux qui sont impliqués," a exposé Kaddoumi.

"Nous ne sommes pas une armée et nous ne pouvons pas empêcher les attentats-suicide. Les Etats Unis nous ont demandé, par l'intermédiaire des Saoudiens, de parler à d'autres groupes palestiniens pour essayer de les convaincre d'interrompre ces attentats, mais nous avons dit que nous voulons des succés politiques avant de les persuader."

Dans un interview à l'hebdomadaire Kul al-Arab de Nazareth, Kaddoumi a qualifié les accords d'Oslo, d'échec, en disant que les Palestiniens ont le droit de continuer leur "résistance" armée et dans la Rive occidentale et la Bande de Gaza et en Israël.

"La résistance palestinienne est un projet légitime et tant qu'il y a une occupation le combat continuera," a ajouté Kaddoumi. "Nous avons arrêté la première intifada en faveur d'un réglement politique, mais cela a échoué parce qu'Israël n'a pas honoré les accords d'Oslo. Le processus d'Oslo était juste une des nombreuses phases. [Le Premier Ministre Ariel] Sharon est venue et a provoqué les Palestiniens et le résultat a été l'échec de ce réglement."

Kaddoumi, qui est le seul haut responsable de l'OLP à être rester à Tunis après la signature des accords d'Oslo, a dit qu'il considère le droit de retour des réfugiés palestiniens comme plus important que l'établissement d'un état palestinien.

"Aucune négociation ou solutions ne réussiront sans résoudre le problème des réfugiés palestiniens," a-t-il souligné, engageant une attaque cinglante contre Sari Nusseibeh, l'homme de l'OLP à Jérusalem, qui a décrit le droit de retour dans les anciens villages arabes en Israël comme peu réaliste.

"Nusseibeh est un docteur sans sens politique," a-t-il dit. "Seulement ceux qui ont éprouvé de la douleur et de la souffrance peuvent avoir un sens politique. Je suis personnellement de Jaffa et c'est pourquoi j'ai un sentiment différent. Bien sûr je rêve toujours de Jaffa.... Les oranges de Jaffa et leur odeur sont toujours dans mon esprit."

Interrogé, s'il y avait une différence entre ses positions et celles du Hamas, qui appelle à l'élimination d'Israël et l'établissement d'un état Islamique dans toute la Palestine, le représentant de l'OLP cependant expérimenté a dit : "nous ne différerons jamais du Hamas. Le Hamas est un mouvement national. Stratégiquement, il n'y a aucune différence entre nous."

En exposant que l'Autorité Palestinienne, en effet, n'existe plus, Kaddoumi a dit : "physiquement, il n'y a aucune Autorité Palestinienne. J'entends dire qu'il y a des disputes de ministères et de positions et je me demande de quelles institutions, ils parlent. C'est une grande tromperie. Où est la sécurité et où sont les forces de sécurité ? Autrement dit, l'Autorité Paestinienne est finie.... Il n'y a aucune alternative à la résistance populaire."

Kaddoumi décrit le plan pour la paix de la feuille de route des Etats Unis comme "un projet de Sharon avec un cachet américain et une formulation que nous ne pouvons pas accepter."

"Les Américains et les Anglais ne sont pas sérieux avec ce plan et tout ce qu'ils leur importent, c'est de trouver des excuses pour lancer une guerre contre l'Irak," a-t-il ajouté.

Kaddoumi prévoit l'écroulement de beaucoup de régimes arabes une fois que la guerre sera commencée en Irak.

"Je sais ce que je dis, parce que j'ai 50 ans d'expérience et je sais comment analyser des choses," a-t-il conclu.

[on peut rapprocher les déclarations, ci-dessus, de Farouk Kaddoumi de celles de Fayçal Al-Husseiny de juillet 2001 dans sa dernière interview: "Les accords d'Oslo étaient un cheval de Troie: notre but stratégique est la libération de la Palestine, de la rivière (du Jourdain) à la mer (Méditerranée)."

For all of the french who read my email: please exscuse me for not addressing you in French but I am of the opinion that my vision of what has happened in Paris would not be told correctly.
I find it very doubtful that a young rabbi who speaks about reconsiliation between the Israëli's and the Palestines would be attacked by a man with a perfect french accent shouting "Allahou Akbar' . I feel this is definetely a set up, that is all I can say.