arch/ive/ief (2000 - 2005)

Hollywood: no Palestinians allowed (by Latuff)
by Latuff Tuesday December 10, 2002 at 03:25 PM
latuff@uninet.com.br

...for the Academy, it's probable that Palestinian films simply cannot be submitted, denying in a way, their right to exist. Sound familiar?

Hollywood: no Palest...
hollywoodokabwi.gif, image/gif, 600x447

The Academy goes to war with the Bush Administration in the Oscar race.

by Phil Ed

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has decided to refuse the Palestinian entry for the nomination of Best Foreign Film, while accepting submissions from countries like Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Chad. This decision has been expedited under the false pretext that the Academy doesn't recognize Palestine as a nation. It would be interesting to read the definition of "nation" as seen by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. What the Academy knows and therefore reminds everybody, is that the government of each nation is allowed to submit one film to represent its country. This more or less defines the right for a film to be presented.

Therefore, as long as the Palestinian government had agreed to submit "Divine Intervention" by Elie Souleimane, the Academy had no right to refuse to include it in the selection, unless the Academy, sitting atop its unchallenged power and authority doesn't recognize the Palestinian government. If Palestine doesn't exist in the movie world, why then was the same "Divine Intervention" selected as a Palestinian entry at the Cannes Film Festival this year?

I'm sure that by now, Palestinian filmmakers - and there are a few, very talented people - wonder what nationality they are. Israeli? How ironic! As we very well know, the Israeli government would never choose to send to Hollywood, a Palestinian film to represent its country. So for the Academy, it's probable that Palestinian films simply cannot be submitted, denying in a way, their right to exist. Sound familiar?

Isn't it in the "constitution" of the Academy, or at least in its principles, to promote art without any distinction of race, religion or politics? Well, sometimes, the Bush administration would use the phrase "in times of war." Now that art has to be put to the service of politics, it seems to me that the Academy and the entire Hollywood film industry has lost yet another piece of its credibility.

Sources:

Oscar Watch: http://www.oscarwatch.com/

Au Cinema http://www.au-cinema.com/News.htm

on a déjà entendu ça.
by Cecily. Tuesday December 10, 2002 at 03:47 PM

les juifs controlent les médias
ohhh my G-od
pfffffffffffff quel racisme primaire.

Confondez pas tout
by R.B. Tuesday December 10, 2002 at 04:39 PM

Les Juifs ne contrôlent pas les médias
Mais, ce qui ne fait personne aux Etats-Unis, leur lobby et leur lobbying est impportant à tous les niveaux
Mais le mot "Lobby" fait peur ici. Aux Etats-Unis c'est un mot classique qui désigne une démarche tout aussi classique : un groupe d'intérêt fait bloc pour faire pression sur tel ou tel milieu, économique, politique, intellectuel
Au demeurant, la propagande israélienne investit des millions pour faire passser ses théories et ses idées : agences de communication, intelelctuels, etc... Et c'est tout ce qu'il y a de plus officiel

Il faut bien lire avant de ...
by Hendrik Verroken, Brussels Tuesday December 10, 2002 at 05:29 PM

"Cecily: on a déjà entendu ça.
les juifs controlent les médias
ohhh my G-od
pfffffffffffff quel racisme primaire. "

??? Est-ce qu'on a bien lue le même article? Je n'ai lue aucune remarque du genre "les juifs controlent les médias "et encore moins une trace de racisme primaire dans l'artice en question.