Amnesty International constate que de nombreuses attaques organisées par des groupes armés palestiniens visent spécifiquement des civils israéliens, enfants et adultes. Amnesty conclut que ce sont là des crimes contre l'humanité, voire parfois de crimes de guerre inexcusables. (Ici: extraits du texte entier.)
|
[...]
Among Palestinians and supporters of their cause, there is considerable support
for armed resistance by Palestinians, aimed at ending the occupation of the
territory occupied by Israel in 1967. Commonly, advocates express support for
the use of violence by Palestinians against Israel in general terms, drawing no
distinction between attacks against military objectives and against civilians.
In Palestinian media and in public displays, there has been considerable praise
for those who have been killed in the course of attacking Israelis even if the
attacks were targeted against civilians. ''Suicide bombers'' are commonly
referred to as ''martyrs'' and their actions as ''martyrdom operations''. Armed
groups appear to find it relatively easy to recruit people prepared to kill
themselves while committing attacks.
[...]
[...]
However, no violations by the Israeli government, no matter their scale or gravity, justify the killing of Sinai Keinan, Danielle Shefi, Chanah Rogan or any other civilians. The obligation to protect civilians is absolute and cannot be set aside because Israel has failed to respect its obligations. The attacks against civilians by Palestinian armed groups are widespread, systematic and in pursuit of an explicit policy to attack civilians. They therefore constitute crimes against humanity under international law. They may also constitute war crimes, depending on the legal characterisation of the hostilities and interpretation of the status of Palestinian armed groups and fighters under international humanitarian law. (see section 5) Many Palestinians who support armed resistance, as well as those who support non-violent action, believe that targeting civilians is morally and/or strategically wrong. A number have been outspokenly critical. But the critics have in general not been as open or prominent in public as advocates for armed attacks who support, condone or do not criticize attacks on civilians. (7) As Palestinian political leader Dr Hanan 'Ashrawi has noted, Palestinians ''have remained silent or whispered in the privacy of closed-door discussions'' about the morality and effectiveness of such attacks by armed groups, among other issues [...] |
web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/Index/MDE020032002?OpenDocument&of=COUNTRIES\ISRAEL/OC...
Amnesty International is impartial and independent of any government, political persuasion or religious creed.
© Amnesty International
As Amnesty International is sending it to all the press wolrd-wide, i think their only goal IS that press publishes it! [ I guess it's copyrighted to avoid that companies take themselves a copyright on it ... But if someone have better information, please send them to us ]
Don't be ridiculous 'Lib'. You don't care about copyrights, do you? If you would, you wouldn't be an anymous stalker, you would be a collaborator of the Indymedia.be collective.`
/// r e d . k i t t e n ///
NB: 'Lib' have DEFINITELY nothing to do with 'Libby', who's an active member of http://archive.indymedia.be editorial team.