arch/ive/ief (2000 - 2005)

Platformteksten UK/VS
by guido Thursday October 24, 2002 at 04:35 PM

Omdat ik hier veel lees dat de platformtekst van de NGO's niet zo radicaal is als in de VS of in het VK, publiceer ik ze hieronder allebei. Ik kan hierin bijna niets terugvinden van de eisen van STOPUSA, waarbij sommige ondersteunders laten doorschijnen dat ze geïnspireerd zijn door de bewegingen in de VS en het VK. In het buitenland is 'stop de oorlog' genoeg, waarom niet in België?

Omdat ik hier veel lees dat de platformtekst van de NGO's niet zo radicaal is als in de VS of in het VK, publiceer ik ze hieronder allebei. Ik kan hierin bijna niets terugvinden van de eisen van STOPUSA, waarbij sommige ondertekenaars laten uitschijnen dat ze geïnspireerd zijn door de bewegingen in de VS en het VK.

In het buitenland is 'stop de oorlog' genoeg, waarom niet in België?


Tekst VS:

The Bush administration is rushing towards war. The time to act is now. The people of the United States can stop this madness.
World public opinion and almost every government opposes Bush's planned war of aggression. But it will take a mass peoples' movement--in the streets, workplaces, communities, campuses and high schools--to stop the coming war.
On Saturday, October 26, 2002 -- the first anniversary of the signing of the so-called Patriot Act -- anti-war, civil rights, labor, student and other forces are joining together to launch a massive international mobilization in opposition to a new war against the people of Iraq. Mass marches and rallies will be held in Washington DC and San Francisco in the U.S., and in many other countries.
As the Bush administration violates international law it has been systematically engaged in a campaign of division and repression in the United States including a wholesale assault on the Bill of Rights, institutionalization of racial profiling, and aggregation of near dictatorial powers to the Executive branch.
In articulating the so-called doctrine of preemptive war, the Bush administration is preparing to violate all existing international law and the UN charter which forbids countries to carry out war except in the case of self-defense. Preemption is merely a slogan to justify a foreign policy of armed aggression and military adventure.
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and company are planning to send tens of thousands of young GIs to kill and be killed in another war for Big Oil. Simultaneously, the Bush Administration is diverting billions of dollars to feed military conquest and away from jobs, education, healthcare, childcare and housing.
The so-called debate that is opening now to public view from within the political establishment presents a necessity for all anti-war forces to become a major factor in generating an authentic opposition to U.S. war plans in the Middle East. The October 26 National March in Washington DC and joint action in San Francisco come just one week before midterm Congressional elections.
There won't be a real national debate on a planned invasion of Iraq until the people are in the streets. We can't leave it to the military establishment to decide when and how they will go to war and to define the debate. We must tell Bush and his corporate and Big Oil patrons that we will not allow this to happen.
This war can be stopped. Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and company can be stopped. But the essential element must be the mobilization of a massive new anti-war movement in the streets. We call for civilians and soldiers alike to exercise their political right to speak out against an illegal war. On October 26, there will be a National March in Washington DC, a West Coast march in San Francisco, and protests around the world.
ONLY THE PEOPLE CAN STOP THE WAR!
JOIN US ON OCTOBER 26, 2002!
http://www.internationalanswer.org/campaigns/o26/o26endorse.html#endo

tekst flyer:

Poverty in the United States is soaring. The real unemployment rate is higher than anytime in the last thirty years. In New
York City alone, more than 1.5 million people depend on charity from food pantries to feed their families. This is the real
crisis that is undermining the security of tens of millions of people. So why is Bush planning to spend $200 billion (a conservative
figure) for a war and occupation of Iraq?
Iraq poses no military threat to the people of the United States.
Don't believe the war propaganda that seeks to portray Iraq as a
great nuclear menace. Iraq has never possessed a nuclear
weapon. The U.S. government, on
the other hand, has 6,000 nuclear
weapons and has spent a total of $6
trillion building this stockpile of
weapons. The U.S. military budget is
already more than the next closest 15
countries combined, and the
Pentagon stands to get its biggest
budget increase in 20 years.
Iraq is a country weakened by twelve
years of U.S. bombing and sanctions.
It is Iraq who has been the victim of
U.S. aggression. The U.S.-led UN
sanctions on Iraq have killed over 1.5
million people (according to the UN
Food and Agricultural Organization).
Sanctions have been proven to be the
true weapon of mass destruction.
Now, the Bush administration wants
to "finish the job" they started in Iraq
in 1991. They are not planning to
wage war to install a democratic government
in Iraq. They are calling on
young people to kill and be killed in order to install a puppet government that will be run by Corporate America.
On Saturday, October 26, 2002 -- the first anniversary of the signing of the so-called Patriot Act -- hundreds of thousands of people
from anti-war, civil rights, labor, student and other organizations will be marching to tell Bush that we need money for jobs,
education, healthcare, childcare and housing - not for a war that will only benefit ExxonMobil, Citibank and his friends in Corporate
America. Mass marches and rallies will be held in Washington DC and San Francisco in the U.S., and in many other countries.
http://www.internationalanswer.org/pdf/o2602flyer.pdf

tekst voor oproep natinonale actie in Engeland op 28-10:

The Stop the War Coalition was formed on September 21st, 2001 at a public meeting of over 2,000 people in London. The Coalition is campaigning under the following slogans:

Stop the war No to a racist backlash Defend civil liberties

The resolution below, setting out the Coalition's platform, was ratified at public meetings held in October 2001 in London.

1. The aim of the Coalition should be very simple: to stop the war currently declared by the United States and its allies against ‘terrorism'. We condemn the attacks on New York and we feel the greatest compassion for those who lost their life on 11th September. But any war will simply add to the numbers of innocent dead, cause untold suffering, political and economic instability on a global scale, increase racism and result in attacks on civil liberties. The aims of the campaign would be best expressed in the name Stop the War Coalition.
2. Supporters of the Coalition, whether organisations or individuals, will of course be free to develop their own analyses and organise their own actions. But there will be many important occasions when united initiatives around broad stop the war slogans can mobilise the greatest numbers.
3. The Coalition shall elect a steering committee which reflects the breadth of those involved to carry forward the aims and objectives. Local groups should have regular, open and inclusive meetings.
4. We call on all peace activists and organisations, trade unionists, campaigners and labour movement organisations to join with us in building a mass movement that can stop the drive to war.
5. We are committed to opposing any racist backlash generated by this war. We will fight to stop the erosion of civil rights.

Aan de mensen van STOPUSA:

Kunnen jullie echt niet mee betogen op 17-11?


terechte vraag!
by Pieter Thursday October 24, 2002 at 06:10 PM
p.baets@worldonline.be

Eindelijk nog eens een deftige opmerking/vraag.

Ik steun Guido bij z'n oproep.

Stop de oorlog is al een argument dat genoeg zegt, splitsingen in deze anti-oorlogbewegingen kunnen we echt wel missen!!! We moeten als één front naar voor stappen!!!!
Organiseer geen betoging op uw eentje omdat je eens graag een "eigen" betoging organiseert!!!!!

Kan STOP USA toch niet mee betogen op 17 november?

Bush of Saddam?
by Bert De Belder Friday October 25, 2002 at 08:02 AM
bert.de.belder@skynet.be

In ieder geval druipt het van de oproep in de VS dat Bush en zijn olie- en oorlogsindustrie - het gevaar vormen voor de wereldvrede, niet Saddam Hoessein. Nergens wordt geëist dat Irak zijn deuren moet openzetten voor wapeninspecteurs of andere vormen van inmenging. Ook het aanklagen van het stimuleren van racisme en het inperken van democratische rechten in de VS is een overeenkomst met de oproep van StopUSA. Toch?

inderdaad, overeenkomsten met 10 november platform
by Woody Saturday October 26, 2002 at 08:40 PM

Heb beide platformen eens grondig gelezen, Guido...en kom tot volgende vaststellingen.

Het Amerikaanse platform stelt dat:

* er van Irak geen bedreiging uit gaat; de US is de agressor
* de US aggressor het internationaal recht aan z'n laarzen lapt
* deze oorlog enkel en alleen van pas komt voor olie- en andere multinationals (Exxon, Mobil, Citibank, corporate America)
* de US maar beter niet te hard schreeuwt van wapens hier en wapens daar
* de sancties een "true weapon of mass destruction" zijn

Je kan er niet omheen. Deze tekst staat zeer ver van het 17 november platform en komt aardig in de buurt van het 10 november platform (STOP USA).


De Britse tekst is inderdaad veel minder expliciet. Veel verder dan een vage oproep tegen de oorlog komt men niet. Maar toch ook weer geen pleidooi voor een blijvende bevoogding (wapeninspecteurs, anders gaan embargoen) van Irak, zoals 'ons' beschamende 17 november platform dat wel doet. Bovendien haalt de Britse tekst uit tegen het inperken van de demokratische rechten en het toenemende racisme ten gevolge van de Amerikaans-Britse kruistocht.
Conclusie...zelfs de relatief brave Britse tekst staat ver van het 17 november platform.


Het mag ondertussen wel duidelijk zijn...het 17 november platform is een rechts, neo-koloniaal platform. Het meest rechtse van de ganse wereld.


Woody.

wauw
by guido Wednesday October 30, 2002 at 10:07 PM

Woody, ik ben heel blij om hier te lezen dat jij al alle platformteksten van de ganse wereld ivm Irak gelezen heb.

Anders kon je nooit tot volgende conclusie komen:

"Het mag ondertussen wel duidelijk zijn...het 17 november platform is een rechts, neo-koloniaal platform. Het meest rechtse van de ganse wereld."

En Woody, ik blijf thuis op 10 en 17-11, beide betogingen zijn georganiseerd om de andere partij voor te zijn en ik zie totaal niet in wat dat nog te maken heeft met tegen oorlog zijn.

Echt niet, het ontgaat me volledig.