arch/ive/ief (2000 - 2005)
|
Saddam, I want your OIL (by Latuff) by Latuff Sunday September 08, 2002 at 06:12 PM |
| latuff@uninet.com.br |
Forget about mass destruction weapons...George Flush have only one thing in mind: OIL!
oil.gif, image/gif, 417x600
|
It's terrible ... by red kitten Sunday September 08, 2002 at 07:32 PM |
| redkitten@indymedia.be |
... Latuff isn't only antisemit, he also anti-Western Democracy! Bastard! Kill him ( <= irony! =^_^=)
Go, Latuff, go!
|
beurk by anna Sunday September 08, 2002 at 11:22 PM |
"Bastard! Kill him ( <= irony! =^_^=) "
Even if it is irony I think it is not funny!
It's begin like a joke and it could finish deadly. It is look like as if I ironically told Susan George is a whore who must be killed because the way she speaks with the media.
I'm waiting other way of thinking about Indymedia administrator hoping the other administrators are not agree with that.
"... Latuff isn't only antisemit"
Moreover the struggle between pro and anti-Latuff about antisemitism doesn't need to be instigated specially by Indymedia.
So I feel your humor is very uggly
|
Don't like irony? by red kitten Monday September 09, 2002 at 09:18 AM |
| redkitten@indymedia.be |
Anna, i guess you aren't following what's happening on this website.
Latuffs is facing attacks all the time, because, according to those who attack him, he only focuses on Israël.
This drawing prooves them right ... but if it's also a crime to criticize wars for oil ?
|
The problem is not Latuff by anna Monday September 09, 2002 at 11:53 AM |
"This drawing prooves them right ... but if it's also a crime to criticize wars for oil ? "
I am sorry but my comment doesn't concern the drawing of Latuff. There is clearly no problem for me to criticize wars for oil.
The problem is about the purpose of your comment.
I repeat my way of thinking about your comment:
To say "Bastard! Kill him ( <= irony! =^_^=) " looks like a step with a banalization of insults. Next time maybe you would forget to tell you make a joke. Then everybody could think that insults and threats of dead are allowed.
Then to make a joke about the way to think Latuff is antisemist or not is a fair way to give up the tensions between pro and anti Latuff. For me it is just look like a provocation to instigate hate.
|
OOoooops! error!!! by red kitten Monday September 09, 2002 at 12:29 PM |
| redkitten@indymedia.be |
« This drawing prooves them right »
=> i meant: this drawings prooves them WRONG! Of course!
/1/ I'm not sure this debate interest everybody here (does it) and i'm ok to dialog with you, perhaps using mail, oki?
/2/ I was just trying to show how RIDICULOUS are the allegation against Latuff and how agressive they are. And i think it have been quite understood in that way.
/3/ It's not about "Pros" or "Antis" Latuff. It's about criminalizing him, trying to convice people he's anti-semit while he's only anti-zionist.
chEErz
|
µ by £ Saturday September 14, 2002 at 05:20 PM |
| * ^ § |
i_want_your_oil.jpg, image/jpeg, 100x144
#