Bush behind 911?

The Time special report, August 12th 20002, accidentally found its way to a family-member; just waiting to be discovered by me.
"The Secret History"
Yes, I knew before and a few US-citizens knew.
That few people from the Bush administration, the National Security Advisers and CIA. Even the FBI didn't know too much.
And some intellectuals and activists, that gathered information and tried to tackle with the enormous media censor by the PsyOps, Psychological Operations, from Fort Dettrick, Bragg, or Lauderdale (don't pinpoint me on the location; is somewhere in my notes), that run the media in the USA, especially during war-times.
Yes: I experienced the media-censor; a long story by itself with many astonishing examples that make the proof.

I was there.
In the Holy land of good and wrong. Arrived September 9th in New York and made a picture out of the plane: The nice skyline, including the twin-towers, just before landing.
Yes, I really was amazed by the high amount of Israeli El-Al-planes. The JFK-airport part I visited, had far more than half of its planes from El-Al.
Strange; sounds like El-Allah.
Why those people make that problems for the whole world, being almost from the same tribe?
Yes, the stories where true and experienced it with my own eyes: I just arrived at "Jew-York"!
Few days later, together with some other spectacular fuss, the towers went down and I immediately understood why they, the foreign(alien) ‘terrorists' did this. For most Americans this still is a big question, sometimes answered by merely untrue propaganda and censor by the Bush administration.
But maybe the case of Palestine where Arab land is occupied and military supported by American Zionists while its population is treated at least as second rank citizens?
And what to think about America supporting the Saudi royal family; they live in luxury and Hercules transport planes overloaded with strictly forbidden liquids (alcohol) arriving at the Saudi airports. And the country has a big deficit because of the enormous number of royal family members spending all the money, merely for themselves. The Moslem population doesn't want them. Osama Bin Laden is more popular than there King and would be elected above him in democratic elections, which America says it promotes in the rest of the world.
But America doesn't care about these issues and is primarily concerned about its oil and weapon trade and the powerful Zionist lobby.
"A wake-up call" That was what I heard many times.
Ah, they finally try to understand what's going on and why those guys are so angry and what the USA is doing so very wrong…
But I was wrong. The American implementation of a "wake-up call" had nothing to do with understanding the backgrounds of the attack.
A sort of hysteria went through the country. I even saw a canon on wheels behind an American truck, driven through the public streets. 3000 people killed, it's a lot, but completely nothing compared to at least 260 million living Americans. Even not a big deal for New York; many more NY-ers die each month of smoking, second-hand smoke, alcohol and traffic accidents. And for the year-statistics, none is able to find the victims of the attacks in the figures for the whole country. For New York one perhaps might be able to find them, probably somewhere around 1% of the total deaths and death-causes and far behind the list of most other death causes.
Also the economic damage was far less, than what followed.
Bush hiding in his bunker as a real chicken and coward (the word he uses for his enemies), did more harm to the country.
If he was a real president and had some guts to lead the nation, he better showed up in a less important town where potential terrorist didn't expect him. Together with some TV-reporters and assuring that there was no reason for panic and that the people behind this probable used most of the arrows they had. Even the bunker could be more dangerous; a plan to kill him could include his hideout.
It was the hysteria that followed and the ‘president' cultivating that hysteria, that harmed the economy overwhelmingly more than the attacks themselves.
Good and Evil, or God and Th(evil)? Yes, in this Holy and Christian country the outside world is Evil, Alien and sometimes not much more than that. "Al-Qaeda are the insects in the dogs pelts", one of Bush his speeches in which he compares human beings to insects, just like Hitler and his Nazi's did before. Even before 9-11, Bush wanted to exterminate Al Qaeda, as is to read in the mentioned Time special report. Like exterminating a bunch of cockroaches, or other group of unpleasant insects. This time, none protested. No single human-right organization. Even not the Jewish, always complaining when someone publicly compares humans to insects, like Hitler did with them. But this time they didn't care. Moslems and especially Al-Qaeda are insects for the Jews (sorry: not Jews; Zionists is what I mean) and they like to exterminate them too!

But maybe the hysteria that followed, was just what Bush wanted?
The plans for eliminating Al-Qaeda and starting a huge war, were made BEFORE 9-11. Not as one of the minor plans, but at special request from Bush himself. Bush who didn't like the earlier plan enough and didn't gave permission to act immediate on aggressively fight them, to block there financial resources and get them into defense instead of offence.
Many times Bush boycotts plans on several other fields for some other personal and business reason.
Like the Kyoto protocol; less money for (his) oil industry.
Like blocking the almost finished research for less gasoline spending cars (also oil-industry).
Like diminishing forests, so less forest fires can happen (but a lot of money is earned from the wood).
And more of this ‘Bush character tricks'.
And how could an eliminating attack and comprehensive plan on Al Qaeda be fulfilled, without support of many countries? Wasn't this an important part of the plan? How do we get our population and the other countries ready for this war?
Anyway, Bush got, helped or let the reason happen, just a few days after the final attack plan was approved: Just before September 11th.
And he lied and lied, too many of them, this very Holy Leader, following his own commandments.
"They didn't know about a major attack"
I knew; I was able to meet intellectuals in America during my US-trips from September to March, that knew part of his lies.
And now everyone can read about it in the Times special report.
Important (not complete) much earlier information from class A ranking news sources:

http://www.infowars.com/resources.html

And now for the article.
Find a copy and read it yourself.
I'm not going to give the full text, or make a full covering extract.
My intentions and questions are different than those of the Time magazine.
I'm merely looking for information about:

What's really going on?
What did Bush and high officials know about 911?
What did they do?
What info & clues point towards Bush & associates involvement in 911?

Part II
Extract and conclusions from Time special report "The Secret History", August 12th 2002.
& News about the Anthrax-suspect.

Time:
N.S.A.; National Security Advisors,
1st week of Januari 2001:
Sandy Berger (this is a man) is willing to make a smooth transition from the Clinton to the Bush administration, only one meeting at the White House is attended by him.
To his successor Condoleeze Rice (woman) and deputy Stephen Hadley:
"I believe that the Bush administration will spend more time on terrorism generally, and on Al-Qaeda specifically, than any other subject".

Chair of the interagency Counter Terrorism Security Group, C.S.G.,
Richard Clarke
Since October 12th 2000 (USS Cole attack) obsessive with a plan attacking Al-Qaeda.
Plan presented to Berger and other N.S. principals on December 20th.
This plan was shelved, because inappropiate: "We would be handing a war (to the Bush administration) when they took office on Januari 20th.

Now responsibility for this plan for the Rice-team.
Most of the present anti-terror actions from the Bush administration are from this original plan.
The Bush administration wanted to go further: to completely eliminate Al Qaeda and not only US-military fighting them and supporting their enemies, getting them into defense and blocking their financial possibilities.
This gave a long delay in actions, because of waiting till the new plan was presented.
Also, no money was provided by the Bush administration; several hundreds of million dollars.
This couldn't be taken from the SDI-budget, so nothing happened.

Mark:
Or could waiting be part of Bush new plan?
Why no money available now and no actions immediately?
Why would there be more money for Bush bigger plan to eliminate them and no money for this?
Waiting, while the plan contains most of the present anti Al Qaeda actions?
Except for the elimination part and support from all the nations and US-population and Congress that Bush got only because of the Sept. 11th attack?
How could there be such a high level plan, without thinking about how to achieve the goals?
How to get support to get into those (Moslem and other) countries with permission from all those countries?
This high-level plan would be a paper of shit, if it didn't contain a plan about how to achieve all this support?
For getting support for the ‘total war' plan, another plan was needed. So did the Bush administration make this plan?
Let's say the: "Let them attack and let's put some oil on the fire, to get all the support we need for our plan"? The let them attack, oil and get support plan?
A lot of clues point in that direction, but coincidence exists, even statistically almost impossible.
Take all the facts together; they all point in THIS (the support-plan) direction.
For example: The domestic anthrax attacks on Democrats to get their support; how could they know Sept. 11th was going to happen? Pure coincidence?

O.K. This was enough for now, the rest of the extract follows very soon.
One thing: They new something big was going on with big airplanes and probably or possibly on American soil.

But now for some recent news about the Anthrax attacks.
From the Dutch newspaper "De Telegraaf" August 29th, so I have to retranslate this in English again:
Only half of the Americans believe that Steven Hatfill is guilty about the Anthrax attacks.
Biochemist and specialized in how to defense against biochemical warfare at the military lab from Fort Detrick.
[Mark: according to info I received January in the US, this is a CIA-laboratory]
John Ashcroft of Justice [Mark: the same guy that new about terrorism with airplanes and forbid his people to take the plane, before 911], tries to give him all the blame.
The New York Times wrote that he failed for three subsequent lie-detector tests.
According to Steven Hatfill, he only had one test and the FBI told him he passed the test.
He wants them to test his blood, so they can find out he was never vaccinated against Anthrax, or got into contact with Anthrax.
But Hatfill made (in the 90-ties) a manuscript about a terrorist that attacks the Congres [Mark: probably this was also known by his superiors, the CIA, for a long time]
He also warned his superiors [Mark: that means or includes CIA officials, going all the way up] about the threat terrorist would sent anthrax by letter.
Furthermore, the FBI discovered that he cooperated with the Rhodesia special elite force of their army, while living in Greendale, near Harare.
According to rumors, the army spread anthrax under the black population.
[… Mark:
Rumors in Africa; you've probably heard a lot of false and halve false of them.
And how does the FBI get information from Africa?
Isn't this more the field where the CIA normally operates?
Didn't the CIA pass this info to the FBI?
…]
But the Anthrax letters had as sender written: "Greendale School".

Mark:
Yes, that refers to this guy.
But who know about this?
CIA knows.
Perhaps some people in Rhodesia know.
Maybe Al-Qaeda got to know if they are present in that country.
Its says "…School".
That means people who learned from the Greendale issue.
But the best way to do the attacks is by putting them into an air-input of a big building: lot of contamination's and people killed.
Bin Laden knows.
CIA knows.
CIA also knows their former plans of making minor terror attacks themselves on American soil.
This was to get the public ready for a war against Cuba.
http://www.infowars.com (now without /resources.html, but the full conspiracy theory)
And why this happened around 911, one letter even send before 911?
Why especially towards Democrats?
And why these days, just before the war against Iraq starts, Al Gore receives such a letter?
Al-Qaeda involvement is very unlikely.
Yes, maybe this guy did it.
He formed a team, a school, as ordered by his boss, the CIA.
But why would the CIA leave tracks and say Greendale School?
He is the perfect black sheep.
He probably doesn't know anything about the case, but they just stole his idea's.
And the info from Rhodesia (nothing special; a lot of former and present Nazi's work for CIA), combined with his strange profile about writing books about this issue (you know: the writer that does the same as in his books to get attention)…
The CIA knew all this info for a long time.
He was the ideal person to give the full blame.
Probably the Anthrax did come from the military lab in Fort Detrick.
The easiest way for the CIA to get the Anthrax, because this is their lab!

Final part with the rest of the Time article and clues towards Bush involvement 911, follows within a few days.

Earlier news in Dutch about the attack against Iraq:

http://www.indymedia.nl/nl/2002/08/6016.shtml

This was removed from the Indymedia Netherlands site newslistings.

Geachte redactie Indymedia Belgie, deze artikelen bevat wardevolle info die moeilijk elders te vinden is!
Bedankt, mark

arch/ive/ief (2000 - 2005)