The NATO Syndrome — Arms, Profits and Lies by Michel Collon Wednesday January 24, 2001 at 11:59 AM |
WHO HAS BEEN CONCEALING THE DANGERS OF DEPLETED URANIUM FOR THE LAST TEN YEARS, AND WHY?
Who has been concealing the dangers of
depleted uranium for the last ten years, and why?
After years of suffering, Belgian soldiers lodged a complaint against
their government. But why has NATO been
concealing the truth for the last ten years?
If the depleted uranium scandal finally explodes, it is thanks to the
out-and-out struggle led for the last ten years in the U.S., Great Britain and
France by groups of soldier-victims and by a handful of scientists and
courageous militants. Christine
Abdelkrim-Delanne has just published “The Clean Dirty War” (La sale guerre propre). This book describes the history of that
struggle.
26,000 U.S. Soldiers Are Suffering from “Unknown Illnesses”
I
was wounded on February 26, 1991 by “friendly fire,” which implied the use of
depleted uranium munitions, related Jerry Wheat (3rd Armored
Division, U.S., which served in the Gulf War).
In October, I experienced severe
abdominal pain. I left the army. I imagined committing suicide because I
wasn’t responding to any kind of treatment.
They told me that my illness was not real, and that it was all in my
head. Our government ought to stop
using depleted uranium. If not, let
them at least insure follow-up medical treatment for those who need it. Remember, the sad tradition of governmental
shortcomings is not new. About fifty
years ago, veterans were used as human guinea pigs for nuclear tests. Then the government tested LSD on
others. Then they used agent orange in
Vietnam.
After returning from the Gulf in 1991, numerous American and British
soldiers complained of physical ailments:
cancers, lung and skin problems, cerebral lesions, and monstrously
deformed new-born infants. We can
observe the same incidents of pathology in the Iraqi population, stated
professor Selma Al Taha, director of a genetic laboratory: “Ever
since the war, we have registered a significant increase in congenital
deformities: hydrocephalus [an
abnormal increase in the amount of cerebrospinal fluid within the cranial
cavity, which is accompanied by enlargement of the skull, forehead and atrophy
of the brain], encephalitis, spinal
bifida [incomplete closure of the bones of the spinal column, depriving the
spinal marrow of protection], but also
monstrous deformities of the limbs, and infants born without a head or a
heart.” His colleague, Al Askri, a
specialist in nuclear medicine, emphasized “a
large increase in thyroid problems and cancers. We are seeing about fifty patients a day with cancer.” This is in the southern part of the country,
which was a corridor of intense warfare, where they are now finding a much
higher rate of leukemia among infants.
They symptoms of “Gulf War Syndrome” are diverse, and numerous possible
causes have been advanced over the years:
depleted uranium, mandatory vaccinations given to soldiers, pesticides,
the bombardment of chemical plants… The
question is complex, and will necessitate more extensive and costly scientific
research. The United States and NATO
deny that these ailments have any connection at all with depleted uranium, and
they deny any wrongdoing on their part.
But it is precisely their refusal to undertake any scientific research
that has enabled them to deny the existence of the Gulf Syndrome for the last
ten years.
The U.S. Army, however, recently ought to have recognized that 132,749
veterans are “unfit for service,” 20% of which have been stricken with “unknown
illnesses.” But the U.S. Army is
rejecting any study, even the ones conducted by the very official Veteran’s
Administration and the Navy Research Center in San Diego, and obstinately
insists that it’s about “victims of post-traumatic stress.”
The truth is slowly coming out despite the systematic obstruction of
the U.S. Army. On May 7, 1991, the
German professor Sigwart Gunther discovered strange shell fragments on a
highway in the Iraqi desert. “I saw children playing with that
stuff. I learned that one little girl
who had such a shell fragment died of leukemia.” Four different German institutes discovered abnormally large
levels of radioactivity there. The
police seized and removed the shell fragments, but that did not prevent Gunther
from sounding the alarm. Too bad that
hardly anyone at all was paying attention.
In 1992, a study by the Bureau of Technological Evaluation of the U.S.
Congress stated that of 148 officially recognized deaths, 34 were cased by “friendly
fire.” And it concluded that it is
impossible to anticipate the number of deaths among soldiers ultimately
attributable to fragments of depleted uranium lodged in their bodies.
Was this the reason why the U.S. Army, after the Gulf War, secretly took
back to the U.S. contaminated American and Iraqi materiel? In any case, in January 1992, under pressure
from veterans associations, the Bureau of Investigation of the American
Congress launched an inquiry. And in
March, the Army’s Department of Health recommended identifying soldiers
carrying shrapnel in their bodies to observe and catalogue the signs of chronic
renal toxicity and cancer. But even
after five years, the number of contaminated soldiers that were identified has
never been released.
The U.S. Army has systematically concealed potentially alarming
information. For example, five months
after the end of the war, a fire raged for six hours on the U.S. military base
in Doha, near Kuwait City, destroying four Abrams Tanks, 660 rounds of 120mm
shells and 9,720 rounds of 25mm shells, all of which were depleted uranium
munitions. Three thousand five hundred
(3,500) soldiers were present and they detected radiation contamination far
beyond normally allowable limits. No
warning describing the dangers of inhaling depleted uranium particles was
distributed among personnel who cleaned the hangar without any protection
whatsoever, and who even drank water from a nearby jerry can. But at the end of the day, officers showed
up to post “radioactivity procedures.”
And two months later, decontamination teams were all wearing protective
masks, gloves and overalls.
Over the last seven years, the U.S. Army has even refused to reveal the
number soldiers that were contaminated in the teams charged with
repairing—without any protection—combat vehicles that were damaged by “friendly
fire.”
U.S. veterans and authorities have engaged in a battle of statistics
since 1992. Up until March 1998, the
Pentagon maintained that depleted uranium contamination effected only 35
people. But recently declassified
secret documents permitted Dan Fahey, a researcher, to force the Pentagon to
publicly acknowledge its “error,” and that there were 113 victims instead of 35. At least.
The determination of veterans has been a decisive element for
countering the bad faith of American authorities who are still stonewalling and
planting the seeds of doubt. Fahey sums
it up like this: He who looks for
nothing, finds nothing.
Sara Flounders is the co-founder of the International Action Center
(IAC), an organization presided by Ramsey Clark (former U.S. Attorney General)
who has led a struggle against all of the imperialist wars undertaken by the
United States: Vietnam, Grenada,
Panama, Nicaragua, Libya, Somalia and the Gulf War.
Sara Flounders has interviewed more than one hundred soldiers since
1992 and began the initial research on the connection between the “Gulf
Syndrome” and depleted uranium. In her
1997 book, “Metal of Dishonor,” she published one of the first eye-witness
accounts given by a veteran. “I volunteered for patriotic reasons,
said Carol H. Picou, I wanted to help. I
became a drug and alcohol medical health counselor ... We were the foremost
hospital going into Iraq, into Kuwait, into Basra. There was ammunition lying everywhere, there were rounds lying
everywhere, there were bunkers that were blown up, and we passed through this
unprotected, our medical unit of 150.
Out of 150 who went to the front, 40 are sick, six have died from
homicides, suicides, and heart attacks and cancer. I stopped my vehicle and I took photos along the highway. There were things I had never seen
before. I was concerned. Driving down the highway—we called it the
“highway to hell”—you know it as the "highway of death"—we thought
for sure we were going to die on that road. No one warned us of contaminants.”
“When I was in Iraq, I started noticing these black specks all over my skin, so I reported it. My health started changing. I was getting sick, I couldn't control my bowels and my bladder anymore. They said it was something mechanical, you need to have it checked once you return back to the United States. So I started seeking answers, and as I did, I was threatened with losing my military career. aAn atomic veteran [one of the 250,000 soldiers—official U.S. figures—who have been exposed to radiation during American nuclear tests between 1942 and 1963] called me and said, ‘You have depleted uranium poisoning." In 1992 I was diagnosed by a civilian doctor as suffering from toxic exposure, chronic encephalopathy of the brain, an abnormal active immune system, a suppressed auto-immune system and antibody development and chemical poisoning.’”
“The army would not accept this as ‘mainstream medicine’ for my medical examination and I was discharged with ‘Bowel and Bladder Incontinence--Etiology Unknown.’ I have long-term/short-term memory deficit. I have toxic encephalopathy—a disease of the brain. I have developed thyroid deterioration. I have developed suspicious squamous cancerous cells of the uterus. I have tested twelve times for the military and they want to keep repeating my tests. My muscles have deteriorated. I have no control over my bowels or my bladder at all any more. Our babies are born with birth defects. We Gulf War veterans have our babies born without thyroids.”
Since then, Carol has spoken out on the subject around the world. Her courage, as well as the actions taken by
Sara Flounders and the International Action Center, have laid siege to the wall
of silence.
Who profits from the crime? Who
has a financial interest in the use of tons of depleted uranium? In September, a colonel in the Yugoslav
army, who was in charge of an investigation of the sites bombed by NATO, and
who was responsible for the protection of his soldiers, told me of the existence
of armor-piercing metals that are either as good or better than depleted
uranium. But the use of depleted
uranium solved the thorny problem of the disposal of nuclear waste (which
remains radioactive for millions of years).
The nuclear industry has thus transformed certain countries—and certain
peoples—into nuclear dumping grounds.
Not being an expert, I cannot judge the ‘merits’ of the various possible
alternative components of armor-piercing munitions. It will be important for reliable independent researchers to
examine this. When one sees the use of
weaponry as criminal as this, isn’t it necessary to discover what financial
interests are concealed by it?
Various theories attempt to explain the ‘Gulf War and Balkan
Syndrome.’ According to Pamela Asa, a
researcher in the field of nuclear biology, the U.S. Army clandestinely
introduced a non-authorized substance, squalene, into the cocktail of
vaccinations administered to soldiers. The
reaction? First of all, the U.S. Army
denied that its laboratories used squalene.
Then, it admitted its use, but only after the war. Finally, it admitted to have experimented
with it before the war, but it refused to open its archives. A Congressional investigation, however,
showed that the number of vaccinations actually administered was seventy times
greater than the official figures. The
soldiers served as guinea pigs for secret experiments.
The same accusation was made against the French army. Their pyridostigmine tablets (used to
prevent the effects of poison gas) were mandatorily administered to soldiers
without legal authorization, despite the drug’s dangerous side effects. In the U.S., this product has still not
obtained authorization from the Food and Drug Administration.
Another suspect: the Canard enchaîné revealed that “the biggest secret is that the French
general staff experimented with anti-fatigue pills whose sale was forbidden in
France.” 14,000 cases of Modafinil
were shipped under a false name while at the same time the French army refused
to disclose to its soldiers what they were ingesting (and many refused to do
so). Such a magic anti-fatigue pill
evidently promised juicy benefits. But
French law forbade, under penalty of imprisonment, each such test carried out
without having informed the subject of the nature of the drug and its
risks. Did the French army break the
law in order to serve gross financial interests?
Abdelkrim’s book examines several suspects, including a pesticide. What can one conclude? First of all, that there is a conspiracy of
silence organized by the United States and NATO, which is responsible for the
uncertainty that is exacerbating the agony of its victims. Secondly, the symptoms suffered by western
soldiers could come from a different set of factors: uranium, vaccinations, special medications for local
pollution. But, in each of these cases,
“The Clean Dirty War” demonstrates that Western armies have all used these
dangerous products while at the same time concealing their risks. They stick to the theory that “its all in
their heads,” because each investigation reveals more serious faults. Thirdly, the populations of Iraq and the
Balkans have not received vaccinations or other products, so it’s very likely
that it is depleted uranium that is causing cancers and monstrous
deformities. The use of these criminal
weapons, therefore, must be forbidden.
Four months after the Gulf
War, the U.S. general staff published a set of instructions in case of an
accident during the transport of depleted uranium munitions. It was a revealing document. It stated that if the packaging were
damaged, it would have to be replaced before transport was continued. A test for radioactive contamination would
have to be made. If the subject was
contaminated, he/she was obliged to be decontaminated according to methods
described “in Chapter 7 …” Note the
strict measures applied to a transportation accident, not to mention an
explosion! Is there a serious danger
here?
Of course there is, and they know it.
On July 22, 1990, Lieutenant-colonel Ziehm wrote in an official report
that there was and there continues to be concern about the impact of depleted
uranium on the environment. “If DU penetrators proved their worth during
our recent combat activities, then we should assure their future existence …
through Service/DoD proponency. If
proponency is not garnered, it is possible that we stand to lose a valuable
combat capability … Keep this sensitive issue in mind when after action reports
are written.” (p. 202). U.S. military leaders know perfectly well
what is going on and they have organized a conspiracy of silence in order to
avoid protests.
This conspiracy of silence continues to this very day. Dr. Asaf Durakovic, a professor of nuclear
medicine, was in charge of examining soldiers from the 144th New
Jersey Transport Corps, and sent 24 of them to the Veterans Administration
clinic in Boston. Tests were conducted,
which revealed traces of radioactivity.
His records and specimens were destroyed and, in February 1997, his
position was terminated for ‘budgetary reasons.’ At the same time, Drs. Burroughs and Slingerlan also lost their
jobs for having requested state-of-the-art research equipment. Durakovic wrote to Clinton to denounce a
plot whose victims were veterans. There
was no response.
But protests were being organized in Europe. In January 1999, a group of Non-Governmental Agencies launched a
large-scale information campaign in Manchester, England. And some countries were disturbed by
it. In August, the Finnish
environmental minister organized a team of investigators to go to Kosovo. NATO refused to cooperate with them, but the
team persevered and concluded that the risks were serious. In November, the Italian government approved
a critical diplomatic note. In Belgium,
a series of articles by Frederic Loore caused a sensation in the Journal du Samedi. Minister Flahaut at first tried to minimize
its impact, then retreated.
When will Minister Flahaut speak the truth? In October 1999 and in February 2000, he affirmed that he had “not been informed of the health risks for
soldiers who had participated in the operation in the Balkans.” But in January 7, 2000, he acknowledged that
NATO had warned of risks and that he had discretely ordered soldiers to take
urine tests upon their return.
According to the trade-unionist, Marc De Ceulaer, the NATO warnings were
not made pubic because it would have given rise to a movement against sending
troops to Bosnia. This demands a public
debate in order to establish the truth.
It’s one of two things: 1)
either the successive Belgian ministers were not informed by the United States
of the dangers of depleted uranium, in which case, wouldn’t Belgium be obliged
to leave an organization that has such contempt for human life, including the
lives of its own soldiers? or 2) the
ministers have been informed of the facts, so in this case, wouldn’t they be
judged as accomplices?
Paris and London Also Produce Depleted Uranium Weapons. And They Have Hushed Up the Truth.
In 1993, a little English girl, Kimberly Office, died in infancy from
serious congenital deformations. Her
father, a soldier who served in the Gulf, and her mother, who received support
from veterans associations, finally forced the British army to begin a pilot
study in 1998. The official
result? Nothing.
But are the British authorities trustworthy? They have been producing this type of weaponry since 1979; they
have spent a great deal of time getting acquainted with it, and they at first
publicly denied having used depleted uranium munitions during the Gulf War.
The French authorities have long denied either producing or using these
kinds of weapons, which have been declared illegal and condemned by the United
Nations in a (cautious) resolution in 1996.
In 1994, however, the French pacifist magazine, Damocles, revealed the presence of nuclear waste during arms
testing. In 1998, it revealed that Giat
Industries produced 60,000 rounds of 120mm depleted uranium shells.
Christine Abdelkrim-Delanne, author of the recently published “They
Clean Dirty War” (La sale guere propre),
questioned French authorities in 1998.
Have they analyzed the soil and water samples from testing areas for
uranium weaponry? Was the personnel
protected? How could they be certain
that no French soldiers were contaminated?
There was no response.
In August 2000, the Defense Minister, Alain Richard, solemnly swore
that no French soldier had ever been a victim of depleted uranium munitions in
the Gulf War. But the soldiers
organized and their association, Avigolfe, replied sharply by publishing a long
list of soldiers who were either seriously ill or dead: Fredereic Bisserieix, dead of tumors at age
32; A.N., who died at age 43 from cancer; M.C., who died of lymphoma; M.L., who
died of lung cancer in 1992. The
inquiry demonstrated that the military authorities had, like their U.S.
colleagues, refused to respond to the agony of the soldiers, refused to release
their complete medical records, and refused to undertake serious research on
the subject. Abdelkrim’s book pops the
bubble of lies and dissimulations concocted by the army and the defense
minister.
Now, certain European powers are trying to put the blame solely on the
United States and are taking advantage of it to promote their project for a
Euro Army. But they are all guilty of
the same thing.
The pro-NATO media’s current tactic is to limit the debate to include
only Western soldiers. But millions of
people in Iraq are at risk because inhaling even a minute particle of uranium
is sufficient to destabilize the immune system. And the embargo forbids sending aid to them. Another crime on the heels of so many
others.
U.S. President George Bush that he would take Iraq back to the stone
age. They bombed, in violation of
international conventions, numerous civilian sites: electric power plants, pumping stations and water purification
systems, oil wells, silos containing grain and food warehouses. It was premeditated cruelty. In October 1990, the Washington Institute
for the Middle East recommended striking pumping stations and water
purification facilities in Baghdad, without which the urban population had to
spend several hours a day searching for water that had to be purified.
They also bombarded, without being preoccupied about the effects on
environment and health, military sites that produced chemical and biological
agents, nuclear power stations, arms factories, petrochemical complexes and
their products, all of which are highly toxic.
The list of crimes that have been committed is long: the terrifying (and illegal) use of
“fragmentation bombs,” which sow hundreds of deadly bomblets aimed at the
civilian population; thousands of Iraqi soldiers buried alive in the desert; the massacre of thousands of retreating
soldiers on “the highway of death” … Fifteen years after Vietnam, the U.S. Army
is not one jot more “civilized.”
But the worst crime is certainly the embargo. Even today, an entire people is deprived of the means to feed and
care for itself. This outrage should
immediately be put to an end. It is
among the Iraqi population that depleted uranium has claimed the most
victims. An entire generation has been
imperiled. Emergency aid must be sent
to help them, and research for necessary health care must be funded.
Christine Abdelkrim has visited Iraq, which she described as a “hell
filled with cries and suffering” and her book has the merit of showing that
depleted uranium and the embargo against Iraq are two aspects of the same
barbaric war, which is being waged by people for whom human life does not
count.
The former U.S. Attorney General, Ramsey Clark (see page 2) has
outlined what has to be done: “Depleted-uranium weapons are an
unacceptable threat to life, a violation of international law and an assault on
human dignity. To safeguard the future
of humanity, we call for an unconditional international ban forbidding
research, manufacture, testing, transportation, possession and use of DU for
military purposes.”
“In addition, we call for the immediate isolation and containment of all DU weapons and waste, the reclassification of DU as a radioactive and hazardous substance, the cleanup of existing DU-contaminated areas, comprehensive efforts to prevent human exposure and medical care for those who have been exposed.”
And who should pay for this?
The principle “polluter = payer” is merely elementary justice. NATO, the private companies who have
produced these arms and the various governments who produce them, or who use or
allow these weapons to be used, should appropriate these funds from their
military budgets to fund:
1) More extensive
independent scientific research on the effects of depleted uranium and on its
established symptoms;
2) An public
awareness campaign for the people of Iraq, Bosnia and Yugoslavia, as well as
for solders and other personnel who are at risk;
3) Immediate
measures must be taken to isolate and evaluate contaminated areas, as well as
to clean up nuclear waste and contaminated equipment;
4) Quality health
care and compensation for all victims:
local populations as well as Western soldiers.
5) An independent
commission of inquiry, composed of scientists who are not connected to the arms
industry or to the army, in order discover those responsible for the criminal
acts committed in these wars, as well as those who have hushed up information
about the dangers of uranium.
Furthermore, the Belgian government must immediately cease,
unilaterally and unconditionally, each political embargo which aggravates the
situation of the Iraqi people and which forbids sending it aid.
NATO has been caught in the act once again. But has it been lying only about its perverse weaponry and its
‘clean war’? Or has it also been lying
about its true objectives?
Remember: the war against Iraq,
the war in Bosnia and the war against Yugoslavia were all ‘humanitarian’ in
nature. But today, the Iraqi people
remain under a pitiless embargo; Bosnia, which has been transformed into a
corrupt, uninhabitable Western protectorate, is out of control, while two
thousand civilians were killed in Yugoslavia by the NATO bombardment. As for Kosovo, it has been ethnically
“cleansed” by NATO’s protégés, the KLA.
Kosovo has been transformed into a nuclear garbage dump. Last October, I invited Snezana Pavlovic, a
nuclear scientist from Belgrade, to take part in a public debate in Brussels on
the subject of depleted uranium. She
said that “Our government anticipated the use of depleted uranium weapons and
organized the protection of solders against whom it was used. In Serbia, the contaminated sites are fenced
off and access to them is forbidden, but not in occupied Kosovo, where NATO
denies that there is any danger at all.
In fact, it is principally Albanian civilians, particularly the
children, who will be the victims of depleted uranium.
NATO has screwed itself completely with regard to the health concerns
of Albanians. Today, the cancer rate is
growing rapidly in Kosovo, as well as in Bosnia. In Bratunac, for example, where Serbian civilians, who fled from
areas bombed by NATO in the suburbs of Sarajevo, took refuge, the cemetery is
too small, because a refugee dies of cancer every third day.
Lets Fight a War for Sales (Bill Clinton)
This terrifying affidavit makes one ask: what are their real objectives?
NATO’s war was really not at all humanitarian, declared Bill Clinton (in
private) on the eve of the war: “If we are going to have a strong economic
relationship that includes our ability to sell around the world, Europe has got
to be the key; that's what this Kosovo thing is all about ... its globalism
versus tribalism.”
One of those close to the president confirmed it: “The
hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist. McDonald's cannot flourish without McDonald-Douglas,
the designer of the F-15, and the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for
Silicon Valley's technology is called the United States Army, Air Force, Navy
and Marine Corps.” [Thomas
Friedman, New York Times, March 28, 1999] It was a war waged for superprofits for the
multinationals, and a war waged to break the resistance of a country whose
intention it was to protect its economic independence. A human life means nothing for those who
wish to dominate and exploit the world.
Nor do the lives of American, European, Iraqi, Serbian or Albanian
soldiers, all of whom were deliberately contaminated.
This is why Javier Solana, the former Secretary General of NATO and
today the future head of the Euro Army, organized last summer a “secret defense”
of all the projects and analyses of the European military, which provoked the
helpless anger of a majority of Europarliamentarians who were deprived of any
say in the matter. Is it up to the
people to decide whether or not a war must be fought, or is it up to
multinational corporations and generals?
Mr. Solana has replied. Today,
we are paying for the consequences. We
must stop NATO!
Christine Abdelkrim-Delanne,
author
of The Clean Dirty War will be at the
Forum Festival Irak this Saturday,
January 20, Passage 44, Bruxelles.
Debate at 16:00; show at 19:00.
Debate at Tournai, February
9,
organized by the Coalition for the Prohibition of DU weapons. At 19h30, at EPI, 21 rue3 Duquesnoy. With Frederic Loore, journalist who is the
source of these revelations in Belgium and the author of “The Invisible War” (Le guerre invisible) (to be
published in February), and Pierre Pierart, honorary professor at
l’Universitede Mons. Information: didier.caluwaerts@wol.be
Three books by Michel Collon
expose
the media lies—The Gulf War: Attention, médias!; the War in
Bosnia: Poker menteur (“Liar’s Poker”, to be published soon in English);
and the Kosovo War: Monopoly, NATO in Search of World Conquest. Editions EPO. Distrubuted by the Librarie International 02/513.69.07.
Sous
les bombes de l’Otan—15 Belges en yougoslavie (“Under Bombardment by
NATO: Fifteen Belgians in Yugoslavia”)
(Video, 43 min.) also reveals important media lies and gives a true picture of
the so-called ‘clean war’. 350 FB. Distribution: Ligue Anti-Imperiaiste, 68 rue de la caserne, 1000 Bruxelles,
02/504.01.40.
Otan,
Kosovo et médias (“NATO, Kosovo and the Media”) (Video) presents the
only hostile debate ever accepted by Jamie Shea, NATO spokesman. With Olivier Corten, professor at ULB and
Michel Collon, journalist.
Revealing. The same distributor
as above.
La
guerre radioactive secrète (“The Secret Radioactive War”) (Video) by
Francais Martin Meissonnier will be screened at the Globalization and Health
week-end, organized by Médecins pour le tiers mode
(“Doctors for the Third World”) on February 4 at 14h, at Dworp (Brabant). With Pierre Piérart (Médecins pur la
Prévention de la guerre nucléaire) and Dr. Colette Moelaert (Médecins pour le
tiers monde). Information and
registration: tel: 02/504.01.47, fax 02/513.98.31, g3w@ngonet.be.
This film is an excellent introduction for a debate, and available at
l’asbl Project Vidéo: 02/504.01.56.
Useful Websites: www.lai-aib.org/balkans, WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK, www.emperors-clothes.com
Solidaire has published
numerous articles and exclusive eye-witness stories on depleted urnaium. Michel Collon is in post-production with a
documentary on the overall situation in Kosovo. Information and reactions:
michel.collon@skynet.be