http://www.projektwerkstatt.de/topaktuell/dan/m_innen.jpg
http://www.projektwerkstatt.de/topaktuell/dan/m_aussen.jpg
www.hoppetosse.net 
> 
>  The Davos of the NATO
> 
> Or the revelation ware of the Antiglobalisierungsbewegung. An article with
respect to the protests against the Münchener security conference beginning of
February that became "KLAROFIX" abgedruckt in the January edition of the leipzig
resident of scene sheet and to show critically tried a perspective for Antifa in
the frame of the "Antiglobslisierungsproteste". 
> 
> contact:   klarofix@hotmail.com
> 
> The revelation ware of the Antiglobalisierungsbewegung or "the Davos of the
NATO" 
> 
> 
> The proclamation of the Anti-NATO-committee, an alliance of different south
german groups prophesies latter, which the planned protests against the
"Münchener conference for security policy" at the 1./2. February 2002
mitorganisiert. This text advertises for the participation in the protests and
to outline tried the exogenous factors, under which for an antifaschistische
radical left could itself therein a perspective auftun. 
> 
> On the Antifakongress 2001, the organizers announced to want themselves
prospective subjects fields zuwenden, that explains itself among other things
with global processes. To this time, "Globalisierungsproteste" in the fullest
gear were did not see and few groups in a participation in this and of the
pertinent formulation an antikapitalistischen criticism the rescue anchor for
the Antifa. 
> With the proclamations to the peaks in Göteborg (AAB-June 2001) and Genoa (BgR
Leipzig and Antifa (M) Göttingen-July 2001), this intention was transferred by
the kongressvorbereitenden groups into the deed. 
> In the view of the mobilization and the activities out of the left and
linksradikalen spectrum during the EU-peak middle December in sheets (Belgium)
the impression does itself up, that exceeded seems to zenith of this
"Antiglobalisierungsproteste". Over the reasons can be speculated. That - for
many ProtestlerInnen in this form of unexpected - Gewaltexzesse of the Italian
formed into a ball, could have initiated that cost Carlo Giuliani the life and
the terror strokes on Pentagon and WTC at that 11. September in New York, in
whose sequence rarely GlobalisierungsgegnerInnen in a breath with the attempts
were not named, a caesura and therewith the end of at least the peak protests. 
> In the present political situation, in that not unexpectedly the scissors
between "goods and badly", between "civilized world here" and "barbarian there"
opened becomes, seems so many a//into the characteristic shirt more closely than
the skirt to r critic. At the same time few do not fall on the conflict solution
drafts of the civil company in. That "humanitarian inserts" and
"friedensschaffende measures" in the age new NATO-strategy mean as a rule the
insert of military means - therefore war -, is swallowed then in so far when
that of the Mär is given by human rights belief. To carry out this matter here
further would hate the BgR-proclamation to the 1.9.2001 runterzubeten. 
> 
> Antifa - (jointly) nothing goes more 
> One believes so exists settled the announcements of many antifaschistischer
groups extensive unity the Hort of all evil in the social system - the
capitalism - to have. At least on slogans as well as "Smash Capitalism" and
"capitalism, one seems abolish" to can himself to yet some. Lacking possibility,
there - like sufficiently since end of the AA/BO assures - is no forum where
groups can exchange themselves over the state of its social analysis. Of there
outgoing theoretically such points herauskristallisiert could become, that are
found for the understanding by company for necessarily, in order to subject this
of a further more exact view. Goal would have to be it to make this criticism of
concrete point with symbolic actions transparent and to propagieren. 
> The periodicals project 2001 initiated after the Antifakongress "phase 2"
supposed itself after characteristic manifesting of this matter, is by a joint
discussion and understanding under groups however until dto. nothing to reports.
The previous peak protests became won in that of ATTAC the Selbstläufer. 
> So it is to be recognized existed presently only heavily possible a joint
nominal antifaschistischer group because only in individual cases on each other
related becomes itself and until dto. no gruppenübergreifendes paper, which
could be designated as a base for a politics under linksradikalen omen. So long
so somewhat also is not outlined, will be possible it also only punktuell that
to confront heterogeneous "Antiglobalisierungsbewegung" with the characteristic
standpoints and into this hineinzuwirken. 
> For some, the characteristic vagueness likes to inspire the participation in
peak protests rather to find so something in the acceptance there like an open
racing, in whose progress an in substance discussion is arisen within this
movement already sometime. 
> That should stand however not exemplary for a serious increase linksradikale
position. 
> 
> The sound makes (also) the music 
> For many, the question in the room stands define could itself, over which
Eckpunkte a joint discussion over antikapitalistische criticism and protests. So
the reply of this question then generally earnestly by antifaschistischen groups
in deliberation pulled becomes, is presently no verallgemeinerbare
Herangehensweise at the Monstrum capitalism recognizable. 
> Momentarily sooner trends in the analysis are recognizable. There one knocks
on crises theories, Apologeten of the classes battle or on search for the basic
principle of the capitalism. Again others fight in its Elfenbeintürmen over the
significance of imperialism theories or over the roll and origin of identities.
To interpret so commendable the attempts the world are, come it unfortunately
all too often in the robe of the pure apprenticeship therefore without having
recognized also only, to want to place this to the disposition. At the same time
the slogan forfeited out of the 70ern "Praxislos is the reading material of the
"capital" nothing as a middle class study (..) and are programmatic explanations
only talk" relating to this until today nothing at Aktualität. 
> At the same time not rarely the characteristic Biografien and the problem
consciousness of Teenagern will forget, that the essential potential for the
autonomous how for the Antifa represented and recently also for
Antiglobalisierungsgruppen as well as ATTAC and Linksruck darstellen. 
> So it is now once an old hat that the evidentest "injustices" provide for
moral rebellion and a valve is sought for the characteristic displeasure. Since
the end of the citizen customer instruction, it is at the schools past with the
bases of the Marxismus. 
> If nowadays youths rebel, then both in fury against the Nazi, the "foreigner"
zusammenschlägt, in the face of starving persons worldwide and also out of the
characteristic experiences with social compulsions, would be it the
standardization through school, compulsion service or the fact with start of the
functioning everyday life to actually stop living. To take up that and to
prepare in the concrete, therein the simple logic, that explains and
Linksruck-Boom to the ATTAC, exists. That then in addition leads that at the
ATTAC-congress 4000 users interest have, while an Antifakongress (only) dresses
600 interested. And this reality an antikapitalistische left must place itself
also. "An explanation of the marxistischen dialectics suits more for a course to
the Kaderbildung than for the first introduction for Aktivisten...() therefore
is it mounted to begin with concepts, that überprüfbar direct are itself -
social inequality, classes battle, capitalistic exploitation. First after the
movement of the current company and its contradictions are cleared, can pass
over one pedagogically to the abstracter and basic philosophy of the dialectics
as an universal logic of the movement" 
> That does not mean to naturally write all pamphlets in the Teenie-Style, but
in all necessity of the characteristic further development, a conceptual part
must be linksradikaler public functioning and Propagierung. 
> 
> Would establish, speak that for a participation in the protests 
> We set is scarcely consolidated once ahead a large part of the spectrum of the
"GlobalisierungsgegnerInnen" in its in substance alignment, heterogeneous and
not finally therefore also susceptibly for simple explanation trial, are the
protests of Seattle, Göteborg and Genoa yet at least to the left of konotiert. 
> The frequent and justified criticism of ATTAC is, would be aligned it not
kapitalismuskritisch, but rather rather only on that, relatively evident
injustices in the world to problematisieren. That is is it, what lets approach
them a mediale attention, that it however also where one radically understanding
left must prepare itself. In the momentary weakness, emanzipatorischer opinions
(of movements very to be quiet) is not quite not at all or only rather more
accidentally result can it remarkable, the one orientation at emanzipatorischen
ideas lacking Erkennbarkeit. That speaks however in each case rather more for
more that than on the other hand to confront this protest spectrum with
linksradikalen positions. A guarantee, that then for a sooner abstract option
(perspective) as for concrete demands on acknowledged social partners (country,
transnationale interests associations as well as IMF) decided becomes, gives it
naturally not. 
> Yet where should one at movement interested left prepare, if not with persons,
who articulate generally yet perceptibly characteristic interests, (also if that
usually in that 3. person results). To take the possibility and the readiness
other (gesellschaftskritische) opinions generally to the knowledge are in
"rebelling" überproportional higher than in the daily. 
> If it succeeds to force the discussions within the movement understanding
itself as globalisierungskritisch into an antikapitalistische direction, offers
that the possibility that groups can themselves out of the sooner classic
movement areas (Antifa and Antira) the letzen years, there in substance
wiederfinden. The necessary and also here and there much opening burdened and
transformation of these part areas there to a politics being based on basic
company criticism would be possible. 
> Exemplary for points of contact that is, after the 11 September relatively
nonchalant use of racist argumentations. This strikes itself then just in
security packages, in the Zuwanderungs (limitations-) law and in the
Legimitation of war against the barbarians and scoundrel low. 
> War outward, according to Repression interior, in the Zusammenspiel with that
would assemble the fear of the "strange" and of the Relativierung the story of
Germany. It seems quite paradoxically if there the kampagnenerfahrenen "part
area specialists" should see no points of contact at its previous politics. So
macabre it appear likes, but in consideration of the current global developments
leave itself in the run campaigns of the last years: explain the war to
supervision company, Antifakongress, Germany, sooner much too many correct
estimations wiederfinden. To lead itself a reason yet once the papers of "at
that time" to mind. 
> Just as urgent a left movement conceptual and strategic considerations that
work up mistake of the past are. A movement inneliegende problematic nature is
jumps promises me its Verfasstheit and the danger, in which she proceeds herself
- like now in the trap of the Antifa - it so nothing you nothing on the next
train of the movement up. Yet the Nationwide structures failed fewer due to in
substance differences, than at the passivity of the most groups, the
Ungleichzeitigkeit of the movement, Fluktuation and the being missing of binding
discussion platforms for discussions. This weakness sooner would probably first
of all be continued than canceled and on short or will long have to knock one
again at the characteristic boundaries. 
> The protests and the preparation alliance in Munich offer indicating a
possibility to lead a überregionale at least in the Nachgang in substance
understanding of the involved groups here. Would conceivably be thoroughly that
in the Nachbereitung over its Institutionalisierung thought about becomes in
order to to not have to begin in the next peak o. ä. all discussions again by
ahead. 
> 
> 
> No unrestricted solidarity! 
> How already further above named, parts of the "Antiglobalisierungsbewegung"
are thoroughly in the characteristic self understanding to the left, what agrees
at least first once hopeful. The task of a radical left must be it to establish
certainly standards. Only the settlement of the characteristic
antikapitalistischen, antistaatlichen positions and the creation of conceptual
clarities opens a perspective within the "Antiglobalisierungsbewegung". The
constant persisting on antagonism of the capitalistic system and that - if also
diffuse - presentations of a herrschaftsfreien company must form at the same
time the reason prerequisite 
> 
> The ATTAC-idea is based essentially on the demand for introduction of the
Tobin Tax, far circles place sooner demands that would have come years ago of
pages of the labor unions. That is owed naturally not finally the almost
complete disappearing of left labor unions (at least for the BRD leaves itself
that say) and systemkritischer, parliamentary opposition. 
> So becomes everywhere right around the dismantling of the social system feared
and the voranschreitende denationalization of social and cultural institutions
beklagt. Only at the same time - in certainly of senses automatic - the causes
become incorrect verortet. Not with the worldwide execution of the capitalism
and that therewith einhergehenden Deregulierung and the decline of the reward
extra expenses (achievements then translated social what hot), becomes gone is
responsibly made at the same time into the court, but rather the competition of
the cheaper locations and the country weak vis-á-vis the economy and the
international financial system for that. This thinking conveys the "moving
together" of the nation against the foreign competition and can be integrated
therefore into nationalprotektionistische drafts very well. With the popular
argument of the dismantling of the "reward extra expenses" become then in the
universal agreement of rewards sunk, increased intensified working hours,
therefore the functioning conditions and tariff contracts ausgehebelt. That at
the same time the stability of the profit ratio and the capitalistic ratios in
the foreground stand and represent becomes the life conditions necessary
accessories, survey at the same time. 
> Only the successful settlement the connections of country and economy,
therefore the statement, which roll plays the country in the capitalistic
company and in the frame the Globalisierung actually and which interests play in
institutions as well as EU, G8 together, rescues the chance in itself, that
those GlobalisierungsgegnerInnen, that yet on the country as regulating
Heilsbringer set, generally first once in the embarrassment run, its
characteristic criticism to rear question andRadicalize. 
> 
> An essential task for the radical left lies in the Entpersonalisierung of the
criticism in peak protests. Without taking the representatives of the pig system
out of its responsibility, criticism of the interests representatives of the
capitalistic Akteure (nations, combines) must be practiced always in the context
with its actual function. All too easily many GlobalisierungsgegnerInnen world
plot theories decay. There the G8 are made or NATO to world governments, becomes
Israel the javelin tip of the US-imperialism, become release movements out of
islamic God warriors. There ProtestlerInnen and people mouth closely with one
another, there there was lie threatens to end vile examples in so many a peace
movement demo against the Afghanistan war where so somewhat. In this connection
must - just for a left in the BRD - highest priority on the prevention
antisemitischer and antiamerikanischer biases put become. 
> 
> There and again one also once again should more exactly listen and take the
"ruling" simply in the word. If the german Federal Chancellor cabbage 1991 in
its government proclamation 1991 explained: "Germany has with its story
terminated, it can itself in the future openly to its world power roll declare
and should this expand" and then 1993 into the bundesdeutschen
verteidigungspolitischen guidelines of the "maintenance of the free
international trade and the unhindered Zugangs for markets and raw materials in
all world in the frame of a just international economy order" the speech is,
brings along one that, The new NATO-doctrine and the Instrumentalisierung of the
DUNO together and comes quickly behind it, that very rational interests behind
the gulf war, that Balkankriegen, that "plan Colombia", that Gewährenlassen
Turkey in the solving of the "Kurdenproblems" and the shining trade balances
with countries, that further the death penalty practices stand. 
> Worldwide trade needs political stability, tolerates no Sonderwege and shears
means itself if there is doubt a dirt around human rights - that capitalistic
hegemony. 
> 
> münchengehen... 
> 
> The protests against the Münchener security conference will show, in how far
Globalisierungskritikerinnen, Antifa and Antira with the "new world order"
explained themselves and will protest against the normalization by getting as a
means of the politics. A politics that operates the execution of the capitalism
worldwide after the rules and with the means of the capitalistic centers. 
> That (in this notebook abgedruckte) proclamation of the Anti-NATO-committee
Munich agrees, if one above mentioned. Criteria designs, optimistically. With
estimations to the military change of Europe, the changed rolls of the Federal
Armed Forces and the NATO, the contexts of war, Repression and racism also in
consideration the 11. Septembers are the proclamation groove on the state of the
time and one could perform thoroughly on that constructing a location
determination of the antikapitalistischen of left. The current publications in
left Printmedien as well as phase 2, Alaska, iz3w and arranca go relating to
this momentarily rather into the same direction. 
> Unmistakably at least in the vocabulary of the proclamation, the influences
older-more left, antiimperialistischer politisierung. are not. This can call
where appropriate also success experiences in memory if one thinks of that 1.
March 1997, when in Munich 10.000 demonstrators who stopped largest Nazidemo
since the '60er's. Alt-68er, Jusos were the predominant part only no autonomous
Antifas. This constellation strikes down itself then naturally also in
proclamations, but perhaps also in the participation in the activities beginning
of February in Munich. 
> To what extent the security policy measures on the protests effect will be
speculative, but interestingly enough is found itself the subsequent estimation
already in concretely 08/92 as a Falco Werkentin on the occasion of the citizen
of Munich of boiler in the international economy peak resümierte: the July-days
in Munich mean in no way a "new step of police escalation". Rather they signal
the return to the bundesdeutschen normality. To the one - and that is pleasantly
- in the sense that after some years oppositioneller paralysis grows obviously
the readiness again to carry the contradiction against the ruling politics again
into the public room, to the other in the sense that the ruling politics its
police in old forms lets answer on that. To designate this as a return to the
normality, does not must hot to has reconciled itself with it. For it is
multiple straight the daily "normality", here like in other areas, against whose
intolerableness to fight is. 
> Lake you in munich! 
> Eric 
> 
> 
> 
>  eNAMEL: klarofix@hotmail.com
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Commentaries Input commentary 
> exact 06.01.2002 15:24 
> 
> the with the young led, that somehow diffuse angekotzt are of the live-and
functioning world, the them actually - in contrast to always crazier medialen
promise (also you can a popstar be, in dot. com-undertake gehts totally loosely
to etc.) presents becomes, and the there all the would contradict discover -
exactly. there once to attach, to an actually experienced situation. and on the
far side of of dogmatic theories, the one over the reality stülptreally do not
suit - it are only models, that what illustrate should, the world formula - in
concrete situations to prepare. exactly examine, is politically holds together
gives are similarly perceive does not defend has itself, what does not suit one
self when why, and to what extent that. and with what it. whether it a pattern.
and where the schwachpunkte/sollbruchstellen/widersprüc . whether other. why
one. before what one. what means makes how she expresses herself, like one to to
anxietyyou personally experience would roll throw off. and again and again the
characteristic rear question. and the cliches, that are will not be able to meet
kontraproduktiv. with stiffness one the stiffness, is transported will surprise
in a world, in that also the rebellion only another ware under many. and in a
world, in which the most important is would echo the appearance and that, and
contents only yet unconscious efficient to not remove the aesthetics so
easily..Wait you for the vermummten krawallmacher, come fight use gives would
advance take in the suit with a court decision. not against windmill, but rather
it. there it already. and otherwise simply once the herschende ideology in the
word to klitzekleine: democracy? wonderfully! here therewith!  
> ene mene muh
>  
> Exact 06.01.2002 17:15 
> 
> Very pretty commentary, makes mood and courage!  
> ... and out bist you
>  
> Point notched 06.01.2002 20:48 
> 
> And if they wait for a court decision, with Mollies surprise: -)  
> Hühnerkacke
>  
> Well yes  08.01.2002 06:47 
> 
> It is would contradict react pretty, if young persons endecken and with
totally kreativer persöhnlicher Rebelion on that, but is unfortunately, so cruel
that, so will not understand is to be recognized one, what the being of the
"capitalism" is, for he only in an abstract theory. Scheiße! That itself today
no one more for political theories Interests because they are was not yes
before, we no "Zombiebegriffe"(Ulrich Beck) more use and only yet totally
individually retain us, are wish presentations of neoliberalen of conservative.
In contrast to that critical theory must inquire the backgrounds and the form of
the company and can be recognized that now once not in the everyday life. The
analysis wikt always abstract because sieçs is also, denoch unavoidably for ne
left! How far the conservatively-neoliberale ideology in the "left" causes in,
becomes very clear if even by us maintained becomes, we bräuchten no "obsolete"
analyses more. Personality instead of critical Bewustsein, an especially
"modern" conservative demand.  
> yes well
>  
> ever now 08.01.2002 15:35 
> 
> The critical theory is was also no Bible, that already always there and is are
inviolable. it considerations, that develop from obviously views of the everyday
life and reflection about that, just as like marxens theories. that there also
yet philosophical development with hineinfliesst and the consciousness, that it
already before you of people gave, who about that thought about, is also pretty.
however no these theories is for the eternity, and the fact, that would grasp
like worker class, and meaningless formula custody sound in view of the current
reality, has now not only with the evil media and the neoliberalismus to do. the
slavish nachbeten to classes fight etc. antiquiertto have recognized one as the
only true and eternal believes, is perceives reactionarily and religiously.
"one" that also only very subjectively: this theory convinces, this record
felled me, this pulli accused me I at...truth? the rejection of this theories
worship as conservative or to stamp neoliberal, is led a transparent maneuver
of, more purely teach which the fur davonschwimmen, of gralshütern out of the
siebzigern, that on the reality only yet marginalAnd perfectly failed are not.
the neoliberale think is also not beliebigkeit and freedom, but rather in the
opposite badly kaschierte ideology par excellence.  
>